How do you determine liability if a motorcycle and a truck collide in an intersection in your state?

Collisions involving a motorcycle are harrowing, especially when a larger vehicle, like a truck, is involved. When these accidents take place in an intersection, there are typically some traffic laws that come into play and traffic footage that can be reviewed and used as evidence. These law experts discuss the specifics in their states that help determine liability, as it may be more complex than you might think.
Richard Howe

Richard Howe

Managing Partner, .

Georgia Law Uses Three Major Factors

Determining liability in the event of a crash between a motorcycle and a truck in an intersection requires looking into three major factors: whether either operator violated traffic laws or other regulations, whether either driver acted unreasonably, and whether other circumstances contributed to the accident.

When it comes to intersection accidents, a traffic violation is typically involved. If a driver ran a red light, violated speed limits, failed to yield, or otherwise violated a traffic law, they could be found liable for the collision. Truck operators are also beholden to trucking regulations, such as hours-of-service regulations, that could be used to claim they were liable.

Reasonableness is an objective legal standard that factors into many accident cases. If either driver was acting unreasonably, they could also be held liable for the accident. This could include something like eating while driving or otherwise failing to focus on the road, even if it does not amount to an explicit traffic violation.

Other circumstances could contribute to the accident or prevent liability. For example, an intervening third party could be liable instead of either operator. In many truck accident cases, the trucking company could have committed errors in maintenance or upkeep that make them liable in place of either operator.

All in all, fault can also be divided among all potentially liable parties. Georgia law allows the plaintiff to be held partially liable but cannot sue if they are 50% liable or more.

Texas: If All Laws Are Followed, They Are Equal

The key determining factor here, in Texas, where I’m based, and in most other states, would be who had the right of way and who was or wasn’t obeying traffic laws. Motorcycles and trucks are treated as “equals” in Texas traffic law, meaning that neither vehicle would have the automatic right of way over the other, as might happen with a pedestrian or bicycle. One factor that would not enter into the equation was whether the truck driver could see the motorcyclist. Again, as long as both parties were obeying traffic laws, [the] fault would probably be assigned equally.

Ben Michael

Ben Michael

Min Hwan Ahn, Esq

Min Hwan Ahn, Esq

Founder of .

Comparative Negligence Rule Apportions Liability In New York State

In our state, determining liability in such cases involves a thorough analysis of the circumstances surrounding the crash.

Firstly, it is essential to establish whether any traffic laws were violated by either party. This could include running red lights, failing to yield right-of-way, or speeding. Gathering evidence such as traffic camera footage, eyewitness accounts, and police reports can be instrumental in determining if any violations occurred.

In New York State, we follow the “comparative negligence” rule when apportioning fault in personal injury cases. This means that each party’s degree of responsibility for the accident will be assessed based on their actions leading up to the collision. For example, if the truck driver was found to be 70% at fault for running a red light and the motorcyclist was 30% at fault for speeding, each party would bear their respective share of responsibility for damages.

Additionally, it is crucial to examine factors such as road conditions and weather at the time of the accident. These elements could potentially contribute to reduced visibility or impaired vehicle control that may have played a role in causing the crash.

In conclusion, determining liability in a motorcycle-truck intersection crash in New York involves an extensive investigation into traffic law violations and other contributing factors. By thoroughly examining all available evidence and applying New York’s comparative negligence rule, an accurate assessment of each party’s responsibility can be made.

Several Steps To Take To Determine The Liable In Arizona

All motor vehicle crashes are a serious matter, but there is an added element of danger when a motorcycle is involved due to the lack of protection between the rider and outside elements. When a crash involving a motorcycle occurs, it’s important to determine liability to pursue a successful case. In the scenario listed above, a motorcycle and a truck crash into each other at an intersection.

In Arizona, there are several steps you can take to determine liability. Start by checking what the police officer determined at the time of the accident. If there are any witnesses, be sure to follow up with them to get an account of what they saw. Lastly, refer to the state’s traffic laws for guidance on who is liable for the crash.

Christy Thompson

Christy Thompson

Founder, owner, and supervising attorney of .

This is a crowdsourced article. Contributors' statements do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this website, other people, businesses, or other contributors.